For Christmas I received an intriguing gift from a pal - my extremely own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (fantastic title) bears my name and my photo on its cover, and it has glowing evaluations.

Yet it was totally written by AI, with a couple of basic prompts about me supplied by my buddy Janet.

It's an interesting read, and very amusing in parts. But it likewise meanders quite a lot, and is someplace between a self-help book and forum.altaycoins.com a stream of anecdotes.

It simulates my chatty design of composing, lovewiki.faith but it's also a bit repetitive, and very verbose. It may have exceeded Janet's triggers in collecting information about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading technology journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a mystical, repetitive hallucination in the type of my cat (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of business online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I contacted the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had actually sold around 150,000 personalised books, generally in the US, since pivoting from putting together AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The firm uses its own AI tools to produce them, based on an open source large language design.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, users.atw.hu who produced it, garagesale.es can order any more copies.

There is currently no barrier to anybody developing one in any person's name, consisting of celebrities - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around abusive content. Each book contains a printed disclaimer specifying that it is fictional, created by AI, and designed "solely to bring humour and delight".

Legally, the copyright comes from the company, but Mr Mashiach stresses that the item is intended as a "personalised gag gift", and the books do not get sold further.

He intends to broaden his range, generating various genres such as sci-fi, and possibly offering an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted type of consumer AI - offering AI-generated products to human consumers.

It's likewise a bit scary if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least due to the fact that it most likely took less than a minute to create, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound just like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have expressed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then churn out similar content based upon it.

"We need to be clear, when we are speaking about information here, we in fact indicate human creators' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, forum.kepri.bawaslu.go.id creator of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to respect creators' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is images. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to learn how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a tune featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and they had not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's creator trying to nominate it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were fake, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not believe using generative AI for imaginative functions need to be banned, but I do believe that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on people's work without approval must be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be extremely powerful however let's construct it ethically and relatively."

OpenAI says Chinese competitors using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually chosen to obstruct AI designers from trawling their online material for training purposes. Others have actually decided to work together - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for example.

The UK federal government is considering an overhaul of the law that would enable AI developers to use creators' material on the web to help establish their designs, unless the rights holders choose out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "madness".

He mentions that AI can make advances in areas like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and destroying the incomes of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, engel-und-waisen.de is likewise strongly against removing copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth creators, 2.4 million tasks and an entire lot of happiness," says the Baroness, who is likewise an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is undermining one of its finest performing industries on the unclear pledge of development."

A government representative stated: "No move will be made up until we are absolutely positive we have a practical plan that provides each of our goals: increased control for ideal holders to help them license their content, access to high-quality product to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more openness for best holders from AI designers."

Under the UK federal government's brand-new AI strategy, a national data library consisting of public information from a wide variety of sources will also be provided to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to increase the security of AI with, to name a few things, wiki.rrtn.org firms in the sector needed to share information of the functions of their systems with the US government before they are released.

But this has now been reversed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do rather, but he is stated to desire the AI sector to deal with less policy.

This comes as a variety of lawsuits versus AI companies, and particularly versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been gotten by everyone from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They claim that the AI firms broke the law when they took their content from the web without their permission, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "fair use" and are therefore exempt. There are a number of aspects which can make up fair usage - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it collects training data and whether it need to be paying for it.

If this wasn't all adequate to consider, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being one of the most downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it developed its innovation for a fraction of the price of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's present dominance of the sector.

When it comes to me and a profession as an author, I think that at the minute, if I truly want a "bestseller" I'll still have to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weak point in generative AI tools for bigger tasks. It has plenty of errors and hallucinations, and it can be rather challenging to check out in parts because it's so verbose.

But given how rapidly the tech is evolving, I'm not sure the length of time I can stay confident that my significantly slower human writing and modifying skills, are much better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest advancements in worldwide technology, with analysis from BBC reporters worldwide.

Outside the UK? Register here.